[pure-silver] Re: bergger 200 real ISO
- From: "Eric Neilsen Photography" <ej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:40:33 -0600
I'd even go a tad low to 80 but that depends on what you want out of film.
Eric Neilsen Photo
4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9
Dallas, TX 75226
214 827-8301
http://ericneilsenphotography.com
SKype ejprinter
-----Original Message-----
From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Howard Efner
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 11:32 AM
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: bergger 200 real ISO
On Nov 19, 2007, at 9:05 AM, Shannon Stoney wrote:
> Speaking of wrong ISOs...I shot a roll of Bergger 200 last week,
> and they look thin. I wonder what other people shoot this film at?
>
> --shannon
>
Shannon, the most commonly used ISO for BPF 200 and BRF 200 is 100
(+/-).
Howard
============================================================================
=================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
