[pure-silver] Re: bergger 200 real ISO
- From: Howard Efner <hfefner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:31:33 -0700
On Nov 19, 2007, at 9:05 AM, Shannon Stoney wrote:
Speaking of wrong ISOs...I shot a roll of Bergger 200 last week,
and they look thin. I wonder what other people shoot this film at?
--shannon
Shannon, the most commonly used ISO for BPF 200 and BRF 200 is 100
(+/-).
Howard
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Re: bergger 200 real ISO
- From: Eric Neilsen Photography
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: massive dev. chart
- From: Jon Mided
- [pure-silver] bergger 200 real ISO
- From: Shannon Stoney
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] bergger 200 real ISO
- » [pure-silver] Re: bergger 200 real ISO
- » [pure-silver] Re: bergger 200 real ISO
- » [pure-silver] Re: bergger 200 real ISO
--shannon
- [pure-silver] Re: bergger 200 real ISO
- From: Eric Neilsen Photography
- [pure-silver] Re: massive dev. chart
- From: Jon Mided
- [pure-silver] bergger 200 real ISO
- From: Shannon Stoney