True, the danger is however, with nobody investing in conventional processes, the lobbies will shut down chemicals before suitable substitutes are found. I'm sure that safer chemicals could be found with a 10th of the budget poured into inkjet paper or ink development. > If the same goal can be achieved with chamicals that are safer to the > environment as well as photographers, I don't see any excuse not to do > so. Of course it is sometimes tradeoff with other factors like > convenience but without someone trying, nothing will change. > > -- > Ryuji Suzuki > "Keep a good head and always carry a light camera." > ============================================================================== > =============================== > To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your > account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) > and unsubscribe from there. > -- Regards Chris Woodhouse ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.