[pure-silver] Re: OT: (picture of) The first digital camera
- From: "Rob C" <forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:35:59 +0000
If you think thats an eruption I think you need some relief.
I just gave my short and to the point opinion and if you think thats being the
OT police then you're being a horses arse.
This forum was, and as far as I know, still is about pure silver and those who
have another agenda ( such as your self ) were not allowed to talk digital.
Even off topic digital indicates the begining of the end because once the creep
begins it can't be stopped. So if digital is now allowed here I'll leave
because I have no desire to witness another set of digital growing pains.
There's countless forums for digital photography out there and this one was and
I hope still is a little island of escape from them. So tell us whats your
stance on this. Do you want digital to be allowed here cos it sure looks like
it to me. IS pure-silver dead.
>Get a grip on reality! OT is OT; "relevance" is irrelevant. Besides, some of
>us have interests that extend beyond silver, and a >link is hardly a major
>disaster. By complaining, you've engendered this response and the trebling of
>the number of OT messages. >Had you kept quiet, those us so inclined would
>have checked out the link, and that would have been the end of it.
>
>My apologies to all (well, most), but I am sick unto death of self- proclaimed
>"OT Police" who are wound so tight that they >erupt at the slightest variation
>from what they feel is acceptable.
>
>-Bill
>
>On Nov 4, 2007, at 11:46 AM, Rob C wrote:
>
>OT or not, it has no relevance here.
Other related posts:
