[pure-silver] Re: Bad news
- From: "Bill Earle" <wearle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:17:34 -0400 (EDT)
I agree that the exposure is worth it. Just don't give them an image that
has signifigant value to you.
Regards,
Bill Earle
www.wfephotography.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adrienne Moumin" <photowonder2010@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 8:30 AM
> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Bad news
>
>
>> Prize $$ aside, I think it's sad and more than a little disgusting that
>> a
>> multinational company like this won't even pay market-rate stock usage
>> fees for images they choose. Sorry if I've opened up a can of worms
>> here, but I've had it up to my hair follicles w/calls for artists to
>> supply free labor under the guise of "exposure."
>
> If there is a sufficient supply of photographers willing to provide
> photographs under those conditions, then what is unfair about it? This is
> how free markets work.
>
> Not all value is monetary. I for one would be tickled to have a
> photograph
> of mine on an Agfa paper box.
>
> Jim
>
> =============================================================================================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
