Ken, Probably would. But I'd also like to see if the lighting was even across the whole print. Of course you could do this as well with a meter; just divide the area of the print into say, 2x2" squares, and measure the light in each square. This approach is actually FAR more quantitative than making a print. It just doesn't necessarily provide you with the visual understanding of what's going on. You're going to have to interpret what the readings mean. On the other hand, the readings with a meter AND the print get you BOTH!! You'll understand what variations in the quantitative measures make a noticeable difference in the print values. Bob Younger On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 6:10 PM, K W Hart <kwhart1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ** > Good suggestion. A question: if you had an enlarger exposure meter, so > that you could meter the light at the center and the corners, would that > eliminate the need to make a print? > Ken Hart > kwhart1@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Bob Younger <ryounger@xxxxxxxxx> > *To:* pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 24, 2012 8:28 PM > *Subject:* [pure-silver] Re: 60 mm WA Enlarging Lens on an Omega B-8 > > One suggestion. > Put in a negative and focus as though you're going to make a 16x20 print. > Take out the negative and make a 16x20 print such that the center of the > print is middle grey. Develop normally. Wash. > Now look at it and see if there is any noticeable fall-off at the edges > and/or corners. Better yet, use a reflective densitometer to measure > reflectances across the print. Now (assuming that everything's even) you > can make prints without worrying about uneven light across the print. On > the other hand, if you find that there is unevenness, you can make a couple > of other tests and determine what percentage of fall-off you need to > compensate for to get an even print. > Have fun. > Bob Younger > > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Marvin <marvbej@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> The Schneider 60 mm W.A. Companon I bought on ePrey arrived today >> and seems to work OK with the basic condenser on my Omega B-8. It looks >> like I could make prints up to about 22-1/2" wide from 2-1/4 X 2-1/4 >> negatives and, more important, make 16 X 20s [actually 15 X 19s, with 1/2" >> borders] with some room for cropping. I haven't actually made any prints >> yet, but will report back with the results ASAP. >> >> > ------------------------------ > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 10.0.1427 / Virus Database: 2441/5351 - Release Date: 10/24/12 > >