[projectaon] Re: [projectaon]
- From: Jonathan Blake <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Project Aon List <projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:44:27 -0700
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:09 AM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 28/08/2013 11:19, Melvin Mah wrote:
>>
>> In section 130, you are facing a poisonous snake. In the The Bucaneers
>> of Shadaki, you acquired a special item called The Eyes of Lhaz that
>> allows control over snakes such as this. I thought it would be sensible
>> to include that considering you have that special item in the inventory.
>> Rather than having just Animal Mastery, why not include that item as an
>> alternative option. Maybe we can say, "If you possess the discipline
>> Animal Mastery or you have The Eyes of Lhaz, turn to 70." Then in
>> section 70, we may have to revised the first sentence to allow that item.
>
> Yeah, I can see the sense in this.
>
> (er) 130: If you possess Animal Mastery -> If you possess Animal Mastery or
> the Eye of Lhaz
>
> (er) 70: You draw upon your Kai Mastery -> You draw upon your Kai Mastery
> (or your Special Item) [so: or preferably something better worded than this
> proposal]
I'm divided over whether or not this would be better in a footnote
because this is a significant gameplay change for this section. On the
other hand, 22tbos section 167 says that the Eye of Lhaz "Enables user
to exert control over poisonous snakes" which seems pretty definitive.
I guess we should just amend the text and explain why in the Errata
section
For 70, I would suggest the following:
You draw upon your Kai Mastery to command the snake to hold its
attack. -> You command the snake to hold its attack.
> Also, should we uncapitalise all instances of Conda/Grey Conda as per the
> PAMoS?
Yes, we should uncapitalize them.
--
Jon
~~~~~~
Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon
Other related posts:
