It might be my British-acquired innuendo but I would strongly advise against calling it a "throbber" effect... On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Timothy Pederick <pederick@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 3 June 2011 00:31, Eric Zollman <ericzollman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Yeah your right. In the real world you can sometimes roll a 0 twice in a >> row. Maybe I can have it flip through 5 or 6 numbers real quick and then >> stop on the last one. > > I was just going to suggest that. :-) It's a problem I've noticed with other > stats programs in the past -- you're never quite sure that the random > number's definitely been freshly generated if it hasn't changed. So some > sort of user feedback to say "rolling now... done" is important, I think. > And flicking through some numbers does the job -- it really gets across the > notion of "picking a random value". > > It's not the only possible feedback; another idea would be to use a > "throbber" effect, like perhaps changing the background of the random number > area to a different colour, then fading it back to normal, or like > temporarily zooming in on it. > > -- > Tim Pederick > -- Postdoctoral Fellow Mathematics and Computer Science Division Argonne National Laboratory 9700 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 http://www.linkedin.com/pub/sam-seaver/0/412/168 samseaver@xxxxxxxxx ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon