[procps] Re: pidof in procps-ng
- From: Craig Small <csmall-procps@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 08:34:38 +1000
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:06:33AM -0400, Jaromir Capik wrote:
> Do you remember our discussion about adopting pidof?
> I'm unsure what the conslusion was. Are you going
> to modify pgrep to do the work or should I?
The conclusion was that yes it can roll into procps-ng.
I don't think we got further than that. If you have the time then
yes go ahead - I think the idea of trying to re-use pgrep might be the
way to go.
On another topic anyone know how good or otherwise the -n option for
pidof is? I might steal it for fuser.
- Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
Other related posts:
