[procps] Re: newlib, ps fix
- From: Jim Warner <james.warner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 17:25:26 -0500
On 08/30/2015 05:19 PM, Craig Small wrote:
The top code is where I learnt it wanted an array "oh its enum* not
enum". Im pretty happy with how clean the api looks. Does reap re-read
the proc fs? Also if you reap and reap again are they different
structures? So is this valid
a = reap
b = reap
free a
Access things in b
No, you would have to open a 2nd context.
But top copies those stack pointers to each separate window where they
can be sorted differently during the life of a single reap.
Jim
Other related posts:
- » [procps] newlib, ps fix- Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: newlib, ps fix- Craig Small
- » [procps] Re: newlib, ps fix- Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: newlib, ps fix- Craig Small
- » [procps] Re: newlib, ps fix- Craig Small
- » [procps] Re: newlib, ps fix- Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: newlib, ps fix- Craig Small
- » [procps] Re: newlib, ps fix- Craig Small
- » [procps] Re: newlib, ps fix- Craig Small
- » [procps] Re: newlib, ps fix- Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: newlib, ps fix- Craig Small
- » [procps] Re: newlib, ps fix - Jim Warner