[procps] Re: new top bug, #662786
- From: Jim Warner <james.warner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 14:08:13 -0600
On Mar 7, 2012, at 8:53 AM, Jim Warner wrote:
> I just noticed a new top bug and prepared the attached patch in case you wish
> to swat one more in release 3.3.3. It's not a "letter of the law" fix, only
> a "spirit of the law".
>
> I have an alternate patch that actually changes the program and documentation
> to conform to the IEC binary standard, but it's feels premature given the
> slow adoption of those conventions.
Good morning, Craig.
I decided to forward the alternate patch mentioned above and let you decide
which should be applied, if any.
But please don't apply *both* git am patches. Choose one over the other.
I'm leaning toward the one below now...
Regards,
Jim
Other related posts:
