[pisa-src] Re: pisa procfs config files?

  • From: Diego Biurrun <diego@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: pisa-src@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:34:05 +0100

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:07:23PM +0100, Thomas Jansen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 06:33:38PM +0100, Mircea Gherzan wrote:
> > /**
> >  * path and file names for configuration files
> >  */
> > #define PATH_PROCNET_DEV        "/proc/net/dev"
> > #define PATH_PROCNET_ROUTE      "/proc/net/route"
> 
> > This might be a very stupid question, but I've got to ask: is the
> > following comment just misleading or is pisa having some kernel-side
> > code that magically replaces well-known procfs entries with pisa
> > configuration entries?
> 
> No, those are kernel-provided provided files with the semantics you're
> familiar with that we use to retrieve some information. If you can come up
> with a better comment go ahead and fix that. If you find it misleading,
> others might too.
> 
> On second thought: could you do a quick grep for those macros and see if they
> are still in use? I could imagine that this is no longer needed as I don't
> recall any parts in PISA using this information, except perhaps a test
> application. If that's the case just remove the macros and the comment.

PATH_PROCNET_ROUTE is unused and now gone, PATH_PROCNET_DEV is only
used in ifaddr.c, so it should be #defined there.

Diego

Other related posts: