On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:07:23PM +0100, Thomas Jansen wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 06:33:38PM +0100, Mircea Gherzan wrote: > > /** > > * path and file names for configuration files > > */ > > #define PATH_PROCNET_DEV "/proc/net/dev" > > #define PATH_PROCNET_ROUTE "/proc/net/route" > > > This might be a very stupid question, but I've got to ask: is the > > following comment just misleading or is pisa having some kernel-side > > code that magically replaces well-known procfs entries with pisa > > configuration entries? > > No, those are kernel-provided provided files with the semantics you're > familiar with that we use to retrieve some information. If you can come up > with a better comment go ahead and fix that. If you find it misleading, > others might too. > > On second thought: could you do a quick grep for those macros and see if they > are still in use? I could imagine that this is no longer needed as I don't > recall any parts in PISA using this information, except perhaps a test > application. If that's the case just remove the macros and the comment. PATH_PROCNET_ROUTE is unused and now gone, PATH_PROCNET_DEV is only used in ifaddr.c, so it should be #defined there. Diego