On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Georges Khaznadar < georges.khaznadar@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Pramode C.E a écrit : > > Check out: > > > > http://news.stanford.edu/news/2013/december/lab-ina-box-120613.html > > The ideas about remote experiments are always very interesting, and > specially in the educational context. > > However I strongly disagree with the "advance" presented in this > e-paper: when results from a real experiment are casted into a static > collection of documents, the work that students can do with it is only > documentary or encyclopedic work; it is intisically different from > performing an experiment, even if you try to mix it with the MOOC hype. > I too have my reservations regarding this; but then, in a MOOC context, we are talking of tens of thousands of students - it would be really tough to give ALL these participants remote access to real, physical experimental apparatus. > > My intuition is that we should give our students an opportunity to create > remotely accessible experiments by themselves; such an experiment > ultimately costs an expEyes box, a webcam, a network-enabled computer > (no keyboard, no mouse, no display) and a network access, plus a few > external components to do the physics. > This is the ideal situation - but the question again remains as to how do we give simultaneous access to a very large number of people? regards, pramode