-=PCTechTalk=- Re: anti virus

  • From: "Wyatt M. Portendt" <nunyabidness6@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 13:16:45 -0500

Here as well.  No question that Norton's is the best or that McAfee's is
highly overrated.  Norton's is also the most expensive and most hard on
computer resources.  I think the biggest problem people have with AVG is
that they forget that it *can* catch virii on the fly, but that to be
effective it HAS to be updated REGULARLY and that it has to do a full scan
REGULARLY to catch those dormant ones.

Here, not many attempts get through due to safe computing practices.
However, a few attempts lately have been caught before they hit the system
via my "mail to me" filters in Mailwasher and due to the fact that Calypso
is a plain text email program, renames *every* attachment and has an
*encrypted* addressbook.  Even the best antivirus program won't catch the
new virus before the definitions are updated or the dormant ones before the
payload is activated.  Antivirus protection, like trojan protection, is a
*policy*, not an installed solution.

HTML mail (with or without preview) is a risk.  OE, Windows, and Outlook
address books are a risk.  Spam and redirects via email are a risk.
Attachments that come inline or without renaming (ANY attachment) are a
risk.  Websites and web bugs on a system that allows *any* scripting are a
risk.  Active X is a risk.  You have to attack a multiple capability
problem with a multi-front policy if you really want to be safe.

Before you argue, consider that on three machines here and three others in
different places - all using the same policy - no virus or trojan has
successfully run for over three years.  You need a good Antivirus and you
need a good trojan scanner, but if you want to be really safe, you need a
good surfing and email policy.  With the new breed of virii, by the time
the AV catches it, it may be too late.

On 8/3/2003 at 3:19 PM a whisper was heard, and the one known as kg6ocz was
rumoured to have uttered....

          |  Wellllllllllll I think there is a downside to
          |  almost every program.. This
          |  same site recommends Panda which I tried and it slowed down my
          |  computer SO
          |  bad I had to dump it..I wouldn't touch McAfee with a ten foot
          |  pole--it let
          |  too much stuff thru. Several of things listed as Cons for AVG
          |  I haven't
          |  found to be true at all..So I think it's the same thing..each
          |  to his own..
          |  ----- Original Message ----- 
          |  From: "Grant Karpik" <gkarpik@xxxxxxxxx>
          |  To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
          |  Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 2:21 PM
          |  Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Re: anti virus
          |  
          |  
          |  > On 3 Aug 2003 at 11:17, kg6ocz wrote:
          |  >
          |  > > Wellll my first question would be because it on some web
          |  site does that
          |  > > mean what they say is TRUE? only ONE web site?  And WHO is
          |  saying it?
          |  > > Now if I was researching trusted web sites and 8 out of 10
          |  made such a
          |  > > statement I would think maybe there might be some
          |  validity..but some web
          |  > > site somewhere doesn't prove a THING.
          |  >
          |  > A number of serious (as opposed to places like Cnet or
          |  ZDnet) ant-virus
          |  sites rate AVG
          |  > as being pretty poor in their tests. Here's one:
          |  >
          |  >
          |
http://www.software-antivirus.com/program/avg-antivirus-review.html
          |  >
          |  >
          |  > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
          |  > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
          |  >
          |  > "A good end cannot sanctify evil means; nor must we ever do
          |  evil that good
          |  > may come of it"
          |  >
          |  > ...William Penn, 1683
          |  >
          |  > Grant Karpik
          |  > gkarpik@xxxxxxxxx
          |  >
          |  > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
          |  > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
          |  >
          |  >
          |  > To unsub or change your email settings:
          |  > //www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk
          |  >
          |  > To access our Archives:
          |  > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/
          |  > //www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/
          |  >
          |  > For more info:
          |  > //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=pctechtalk
          |  >
          |  >
          |  
          |  
          |  To unsub or change your email settings:
          |  //www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk
          |  
          |  To access our Archives:
          |  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/
          |  //www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/
          |  
          |  For more info:
          |  //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=pctechtalk


********* And So It Was ***********

To unsub or change your email settings:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk

To access our Archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/
//www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/

For more info:
//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=pctechtalk

Other related posts: