-=PCTechTalk=- Re: Zone Alarm always rated low---Why???
- From: gkarpik@xxxxxxxxx
- To: pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:16:57 -0700
Quoting "Wyatt M. Portendt" <nunyabidness6@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Some would disagree.
>
> http://www.informationweek.com/story/IWK20020412S0009
And your point is? A review from a year ago about a very outdated version of
Zone Alarm shows us, what?
> On 8/18/2003 at 4:36 AM a whisper was heard, and the one known as Grant
> Karpik was rumoured to have uttered....
>
> | On 18 Aug 2003 at 6:54, David Weaver wrote:
> |
> | > Well, unless they improved it, ZA will allowed hijacked
> | packets out,
> | > whereas Outpost won't. And I know before you couldn't
> | assign blocked
> | > destinations by IP and/or protocol, in either the free or
> | the paid.
> | >
> | > Zone Labs rested on its laurels too much, and now there's a
> | better
> | > firewall (IMHO).
> | >
> | > Dave
> |
> |
> | Don't want to get into a 'mine's bigger/better than yours'
> | match but the Zone Alarm of
> | today isn't the Zone Alarm of yesterday. Seems to me that
> | their's a fair bit of 'fud' being
> | spread on this subject over the last couple of days and folks
> | might want to take
> | everything that's been said about various software firewalls
> | with a grain of salt and do a
> | bit of research for themselves.
> |
> | And that's all *I* have to say on the subject....
To unsub or change your email settings:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk
To access our Archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/
//www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/
For more info:
//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=pctechtalk
Other related posts:
