[patriots] Re: The Bible's authority

  • From: "Chris Pead" <cpead@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <ukpatriot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Patriots JGroup" <patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 23:13:11 -0000

Also John, our Common Law is based on the Bible - Chris



From: patriots-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:patriots-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jack Lewis
Sent: 31 December 2015 19:03
To: patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [patriots] The Bible's authority



Hi John,
How is it that you are prepared to accept that the Bible is a very good
basis for creating a workable society and yet do not acknowledge its
originator? If you believe it was inspired by mere men then how do you
account for it being written over thousands of years by so many different
kinds of people from all different backgrounds and yet maintain its
underlying uniqueness? Every other holy book can clearly be seen to be
inspired by men and that they fail to have that same level of authority.

Why has the Bible lasted so long, it has always been the world's most
popular and best selling book by far, if it didn't have some kind of divine
origin. It is too much of a stretch of the imagination to simply say it was
inspired and written by men. Anything that originated from man can be
changed and always is. Take the Constitution of the UK and the USA for
example and how they have been ignored and changed.

Jack




On 31/12/2015 18:47, john TIMBRELL wrote:

I have already read it Mike, and was going to reply to Jack who circulated
it.

It seems to go against what he has previously written. That Satan is an
entity as opposed to part of the human condition which this PDF proposes and
examines using bible quotes.

Jesus came to earth as a man. When he went into the desert for the 40 days
and 40 nights I always considered that it was his human weaknesses that was
the devil and not some spiritual being like god is alleged to be.

I decided not to reply to Jack because I did not wish to enter a discussion
on this because I wish to remain focussed on earthly things. Like you Jack
and Chris I believe the NWO is being pushed by Jews although I have yet to
become as convinced as you three are, that it is just evil people who just
happen to be Jews. However, I tend to agree with you but do not push it when
speaking to others who believe that the Jews are persecuted.

Yes I do value the bible, and the necessity to accept a sovereign who is
supposed to protect us according to the coronation oath. We need to hang on
to that. But the bottom line is , as the common law states or more correctly
accepts, is that no one can prove that your version/description of God is
correct or incorrect.What no man can dispute is that we are below whatever
god you believe in. I actually envy your three's belief but I cannot pretend
that I do believe.But we all need to accept that there is something beyond
our control, call it God if you wish, because if we lose that, humanity is
doomed.

,

_____

Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 18:19:28 +0000
From: mikegreen247@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:mikegreen247@xxxxxxxxx>
To: johntimbrell@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:johntimbrell@xxxxxxxxxx> ;
patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Fwd: Fwd: [patriots] Re: For Patriots (except Jack or Chris)

John,

I recommend that you read this paper too, if you haven't already. And I mean
ALL of it. It is a very thought provoking and CORRECT understanding (or
rather simple, plain acceptance) of Scriptural doctrine. I have said to you
before, but will remind you now, that the Old Testament is the history of
the Caucasian people before we arrived in Europe. You seem to acknowledge
that our problems are largely, if not fully, down to our getting away from
Common Law. You also seem to acknowledge that our Common Law is based on
Biblical Law, as it indeed is. Well, the Bible has a great deal to say about
that too. Jesus Christ Himself made this very clear. In fact as I was
reading the attached paper, especially some of the Bible quotes, at times I
felt as if I might have been reading one of your emails. If only our people
could get to grips with this then our problems would be over.

Mike.



-------- Forwarded Message --------


Subject:

Fwd: [patriots] Re: For Patriots (except Jack or Chris)


Date:

Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:33:22 + 0000


From:

Mike Green <mailto:mikegreen247@xxxxxxxxx> <mikegreen247@xxxxxxxxx>


To:

patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>



Thanks Jack. Everyone should read this paper. The notion of some
supernatural being called "Satan" who goads us into being naughty and so on
was invented by the Jews, no doubt to take our minds off the real
"adversary", the proper meaning of the original Hebrew, who is, of course,
the Jews themselves. Jesus Christ made no bones about exposing them. They
are also the "beast" of the book of Revelation, the beast being identified
as having murdered the prophets. Jesus Christ told the Jews that THEY would
be held responsible for the murder of the prophets. Hence the Jews and the
beast must be one and the same (a beast in prophecy never represents an
individual, but always a system, people, empire etc). He also told them to
their face that they were "of their father the devil", the word "devil"
being a transliteration, and NOT a translation, of the Koine Greek common
noun "diabalos" which simply meant "false accuser" or "adversary". The wole
of the Bible is about the enmity between two peoples. On the one hand the
children of God, Israel, the Caucasian people; and on the other hand the
people who are called "the adversary", Canaanites, Edom, nowadays referred
to as Jews. That enmity is raging right now and is about to reach its
ultimate climax. As as been said before, we are living in very interesting
times!

Mike.



-------- Forwarded Message --------


Subject:

[patriots] Re: For Patriots (except Jack or Chris)


Date:

Wed, 30 Dec 2015 23:05:05 +0000


From:

Jack Lewis <mailto:ukpatriot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<ukpatriot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Reply-To:

ukpatriot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:ukpatriot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


To:

patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>



I happen to be reading Arnold Kennedy's pdf of 'satan' the adversary.
I have attached it if anyone else is interested in reading it.


Jack



On 30/12/2015 19:46, Mike Green wrote:

Exactly Chris. NASA is just another Jewish scam, the purpose of which is to
take God out of the equation. The term "Satan" as it appears in the original
Hebrew and Greek of the Bible is actually a common noun which means
"adversary".

Mike.

On 30/12/15 19:41, Chris Pead wrote:

Thanks Mike - I left out the word Satan - NASA + The Tongue!!





From: patriots-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:patriots-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:patriots-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Green
Sent: 30 December 2015 19:21
To: patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [patriots] Re: For Patriots (except Jack or Chris)



Here is that logo:





NASA refers to the red portion as "the worm". Does it look like a worm to
you? Or does it look like the FORKED TONGUE of a serpent? Are you getting
the picture?

Mike.

On 30/12/15 17:40, Chris Pead wrote:

I agree too, remember NASA is an anagram minus the "T" which is made up by a
forked tongue on their logo! - Chris



From: patriots-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:patriots-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:patriots-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Green
Sent: 30 December 2015 16:51
To: patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [patriots] Re: For Patriots (except Jack or Chris)



I agree Jack. You have to have resistance to create an equal and opposite
force. There is no resistance in a vacuum. Hence NASA is definitely lying.
They are either lying by telling us that space is a vacuum, or they are
lying about rockets working in space. Take your pick folk.

Mike.

On 29/12/15 23:50, Jack Lewis wrote:

I saw part of this and it was bull. It was pure NASA and nothing but NASA.
'Nuff said?
Rockets will not work in a vacuum because there is nothing to push against.
The trolley experiment was a sham! The only reason the trolley moved with
the boys on was because they were pushing against it when they threw the
bags off.
If the boys had been suspended on a wire and threw a bag they would only
have have moved a tiny amount caused by pushing against the air. If there
was no air they wouldn't move at all.


Jack

On 29/12/2015 19:39, john TIMBRELL wrote:

Lovely warm entertaining and informative programme on space trave. Royal
Institution Christmas Lectures.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b06tg0hv/royal-institution-christmas-le
ctures-2015-how-to-survive-in-space-1-lift-o



Don't watch 46 minutes in Jack it proves Newton's theory.





<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campai
gn=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>

This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campai
gn=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> www.avast.com

















PNG image

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. patriots
  3. Archive
  4. 12-2015