[patriots] Re: For Patriots (except Jack or Chris)

  • From: john TIMBRELL <johntimbrell@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: mike green <mikegreen247@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 18:47:58 +0000

I have already read it Mike, and was going to reply to Jack who circulated it.
It seems to go against what he has previously written. That Satan is an entity
as opposed to part of the human condition which this PDF proposes and examines
using bible quotes.Jesus came to earth as a man. When he went into the desert
for the 40 days and 40 nights I always considered that it was his human
weaknesses that was the devil and not some spiritual being like god is alleged
to be.I decided not to reply to Jack because I did not wish to enter a
discussion on this because I wish to remain focussed on earthly things. Like
you Jack and Chris I believe the NWO is being pushed by Jews although I have
yet to become as convinced as you three are, that it is just evil people who
just happen to be Jews. However, I tend to agree with you but do not push it
when speaking to others who believe that the Jews are persecuted.Yes I do value
the bible, and the necessity to accept a sovereign who is supposed to protect
us according to the coronation oath. We need to hang on to that. But the bottom
line is , as the common law states or more correctly accepts, is that no one
can prove that your version/description of God is correct or incorrect.What no
man can dispute is that we are below whatever god you believe in. I actually
envy your three's belief but I cannot pretend that I do believe.But we all need
to accept that there is something beyond our control, call it God if you wish,
because if we lose that, humanity is doomed.

,
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 18:19:28 +0000
From: mikegreen247@xxxxxxxxx
To: johntimbrell@xxxxxxxxxx; patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Fwd: Fwd: [patriots] Re: For Patriots (except Jack or Chris)







John,



I recommend that you read this paper too, if you haven't already.
And I mean ALL of it. It is a very thought provoking and CORRECT
understanding (or rather simple, plain acceptance) of Scriptural
doctrine. I have said to you before, but will remind you now, that
the Old Testament is the history of the Caucasian people before we
arrived in Europe. You seem to acknowledge that our problems are
largely, if not fully, down to our getting away from Common Law.
You also seem to acknowledge that our Common Law is based on
Biblical Law, as it indeed is. Well, the Bible has a great deal to
say about that too. Jesus Christ Himself made this very clear. In
fact as I was reading the attached paper, especially some of the
Bible quotes, at times I felt as if I might have been reading one
of your emails. If only our people could get to grips with this
then our problems would be over.



Mike.






-------- Forwarded Message --------



Subject:

Fwd: [patriots] Re: For Patriots (except Jack or Chris)


Date:
Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:33:22 + 0000


From:
Mike Green <mikegreen247@xxxxxxxxx>


To:
patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>








Thanks Jack. Everyone should read this paper.
The notion of some supernatural being called "Satan" who
goads us into being naughty and so on was invented by the Jews, no
doubt to take our minds off the real "adversary", the proper
meaning of the original Hebrew, who is, of course, the Jews
themselves. Jesus Christ made no bones about exposing them. They
are also the "beast" of the book of Revelation, the beast being
identified as having murdered the prophets. Jesus Christ told the
Jews that THEY would be held responsible for the murder of the
prophets. Hence the Jews and the beast must be one and the same (a
beast in prophecy never represents an individual, but always a
system, people, empire etc). He also told them to their face that
they were "of their father the devil", the word "devil" being a
transliteration, and NOT a translation, of the Koine Greek common
noun "diabalos" which simply meant "false accuser" or "adversary".
The wole of the Bible is about the enmity between two peoples. On
the one hand the children of God, Israel, the Caucasian people;
and on the other hand the people who are called "the adversary",
Canaanites, Edom, nowadays referred to as Jews. That enmity is
raging right now and is about to reach its ultimate climax. As as
been said before, we are living in very interesting times!



Mike.





-------- Forwarded Message --------




Subject:


[patriots] Re: For Patriots (except Jack or Chris)


Date:

Wed, 30 Dec 2015 23:05:05 +0000


From:

Jack Lewis <ukpatriot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Reply-To:


ukpatriot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


To:
patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx








I happen to be reading Arnold
Kennedy's pdf of 'satan' the adversary.

I have attached it if anyone else is interested in reading
it.





Jack






On 30/12/2015 19:46, Mike Green
wrote:




Exactly Chris. NASA is just another Jewish
scam, the purpose of which is to take God out of the
equation. The term "Satan" as it appears in the original
Hebrew and Greek of the Bible is actually a common noun
which means "adversary".



Mike.



On 30/12/15 19:41, Chris Pead
wrote:








Thanks



Mike – I left out the word Satan – NASA + The Tongue!!




From: patriots-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:patriots-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Mike Green

Sent: 30 December 2015 19:21

To: patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: [patriots] Re: For Patriots
(except Jack or Chris)



Here
is that logo:











NASA refers to the red portion as "the worm". Does it
look like a worm to you? Or does it look like the
FORKED TONGUE of a serpent? Are you getting the
picture?



Mike.





On 30/12/15 17:40, Chris Pead
wrote:


I
agree too, remember NASA is an anagram minus the “T”
which is made up by a forked tongue on their logo! -
Chris



From: patriots-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:patriots-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Mike Green

Sent: 30 December 2015 16:51

To: patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: [patriots] Re: For Patriots
(except Jack or Chris)



I
agree Jack. You have to have resistance to create an
equal and opposite force. There is no resistance in
a vacuum. Hence NASA is definitely lying.
They are either lying by telling us that space is a
vacuum, or they are lying about rockets working in
space. Take your pick folk.



Mike.

On 29/12/15 23:50, Jack Lewis
wrote:


I saw
part of this and it was bull. It was pure NASA and
nothing but NASA. 'Nuff said?

Rockets will not work in a vacuum because there is
nothing to push against.

The trolley experiment was a sham! The only reason
the trolley moved with the boys on was because
they were pushing against it when they threw the
bags off.

If the boys had been suspended on a wire and threw
a bag they would only have have moved a tiny
amount caused by pushing against the air. If there
was no air they wouldn't move at all.





Jack

On 29/12/2015 19:39, john
TIMBRELL wrote:



Lovely warm entertaining and
informative programme on space trave. Royal
Institution Christmas Lectures.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b06tg0hv/royal-institution-christmas-lectures-2015-how-to-survive-in-space-1-lift-o





Don't watch 46 minutes in
Jack it proves Newton's theory.












This



email has been sent from a
virus-free computer protected by
Avast.

www.avast.com





























PNG image

Other related posts: