[patriots] More on UKIP ban

  • From: annette rose smith <annette-rose-smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Norman Scarth <againstcorruption@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hugh Jones <hughjonsey@xxxxxxxxx>, andrew <andrew.edwards1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kate <talk2ktc@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "malcolmskylark@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <malcolmskylark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:23 +0100

 
 
From: senorburrito@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: jbsbrickbat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gaia2600@xxxxxxxxxxx; 
aeneas.lavinium@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; albertburgess@xxxxxxxxxxx; sonyaporter@xxxxxxx; 
dralancclifford@xxxxxxxxx; legioxgeminaequestris@xxxxxxxxx; 
sean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; stuckeybrit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; carmans45@xxxxxxxxxxx; 
peely56@xxxxxxxxx; annette-rose-smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; bjgerrish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
rosemarie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; andrewjmoffat@xxxxxxxxxx; 
harry.beckhough@xxxxxxxxx; deimus_zeus01@xxxxxxxxx; peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
heall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; hughjonsey@xxxxxxxxx; avatar_20@xxxxxxxxxxx; 
del1young@xxxxxxxxx; cooklou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dansmith1954@xxxxxxx; 
elizabeth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; terenceoakes916@xxxxxxx; zoilandon@xxxxxxx; 
editor@xxxxxxxxxxxx; r.poulton1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; christopher.dyer@xxxxxxxxxx; 
axel.berglund@xxxxxxxxxxx; earlgrey@xxxxxxxxxx; ejhuxley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
fernea720@xxxxxxx; george.rolph@xxxxxxxxx; gordonhleonard@xxxxxxxxx; 
chuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; pgonzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; phcooper1503@xxxxxxxxxxx; 
stephen_m_dixon@xxxxxxxxxxx; klauritz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; lindsay.jenkins@xxxxxxx; 
keithgriffin10@xxxxxxxxxxx; michaelsmith56@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
veronicatmjordan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lordnelson1805@xxxxxxxxx; 
tderikson@xxxxxxxxxxx; satigoonewardene@xxxxxxx; 
mike-armchairarmoury@xxxxxxxxxxxx; jchacksfield@xxxxxxxxx; 
senorburrito@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; alpha14@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
jdmassociates@xxxxxxxxxxxx; nickchance@xxxxxxxxxxx; legionxiiii@xxxxxxxxxxx; 
paulweston59@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; elsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; edward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
s.j.shepherd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; johntimbrell@xxxxxxxxxx; robintilbrook@xxxxxxx; 
talk2ktc@xxxxxxxxxxx; roger.cooper@xxxxxxx; morrisdjb@xxxxxxx; press@xxxxxxx; 
janddcg@xxxxxxxxxxx; markgoode@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; martinhensman@xxxxxxxxxxx; 
matthew_tait@xxxxxxxxxxx; jean.tyzack@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
rebellionseattraitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; pmarchini@xxxxxxxxxxx; dgrayfisk@xxxxxxx; 
jean.tyzack@xxxxxxxxxx; peterholdforth@xxxxxxxxxxx; seangabb@xxxxxxxxxxx; 
terrylyden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: FW: UKIP Ban
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:58:10 +0100






From: senorburrito@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: dgrayfisk@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: UKIP Ban
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:56:36 +0100




UKIP is not the BNP. The BNP are real national Socialists, with something of a 
shady past. We don't have the time left to be "nice" about matters. I warned 
UKIP that the Antifas would target them and they did. I received a phone call 
from one of Farage's advisers thanking me. I have also had other calls of 
support from angry senior members asking "What the hell is going on?" I am 
certain this is more to do with vindictiveness on the part of the local Chair. 
Anyway not to worry. I have asked these people- very senior UKIP folk not to 
push too hard for my reinstatement because it will force me to bide my tongue 
and that I cannot do. I am also a Bishop in the Old Catholic Church and I must 
speak out against evil. so maybe not being part of UKIP is a good thing.
Regards
Guy

From: "" <dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender 
"DGrayFisk@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 10:54:47 -0400
Subject: Re: UKIP Ban
To: senorburrito@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
CC: beveridge1@xxxxxx; nikolai.tolstoy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
dmitritolstoy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Peter77Mullen@xxxxxxxxx; transborder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx






I hear what you say, Guy, and agree with most of 
it.
 
The difficulty is the narrow tight-rope which UKIP needs to 
tread to still be acceptable to both the media and the 'liberal left'.  

 
Were UKIP and its members to shout what 
you desire from the rooftops it would only deny them a voice through the 
BBC and printed press.
 
Look how the BNP was denigrated - and now virtually 
defunct.  Is that what you want from UKIP?  Sorry, Guy, but we have to 
tread moderately and carefully.  
 
Say what you like to your readership but let UKIP try its best 
to garner support from a wide chunk of  the electorate.  If and when a 
sizeable chunk of UKIP MPs are finally elected to Westminster, and 
considered almost normal,  that might be the time to speak out boldly 
on such issues; but not before!
 
Best,
 
Delphine

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for 
good men to do nothing
Edmund Burke 1729 -1797


 

In a message dated 23/09/2014 13:03:10 GMT Daylight Time, 
senorburrito@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

  
  GLT 
  banned by UKIP
  

  23rd September 2014
  

  
My ban by UKIP from "Membership" of that Party was confirmed 
  around lunchtime today.  
  The problem they have with me is my writings in respect of Islam. 
  Apparently they have "many
  Moslem followers" and don't want to "upset them" according to my 
  informant. I would ask UKIP,
  "What about the silent majority whom such religious believers offend 
  daily? Do their votes
  not count then?" UKIP are not going to get mine now and from comments by 
  my reputed 500,000
  readership, neither will they be voting.
  

  Safety from a threat such as the one I have warned about over the last 
  decade or so, is not going
  to defend or protect UKIP, Its Membership, or the country and our 
  descendants from its baleful
  results, that are all too clearly seen around us daily, simply because 
  they ban those of us who
  "tell it as it is" from expressing an opinion- and that is all I 
  have done. It is so easy to kill the
  messenger, while the ever encroaching forces of darkness engulf the 
  country.
  

  I even know who was responsible- a silly little man and ex trade unionist 
  and a well known social
  climber, who in truth will make an excellent politician given the above 
  attributes so common to 
  the current breed, to be found in Wastemonster. 
  

  Little does this fellow realise that many sneer behind his back, 
  recognising him for what he is-
  a prole making his way up the greasy pole used by all such types. I have 
  assiduously avoided
  social climbing, never sought to deny my origins, not the excellent, 
  social and family context
  I was born into.
  

  He will do well at the trough. 
  

  He is eminently qualified like so 
  many. This same creature accused me of being 
"over-emotive", 
  "heated" and a number of other things but when one is talking about 
  the end of a people, a country, 
  a culture even a Christian religion, it does rather tend to make 
  one "emotional", even hysterically angry
   but like so many in the current political world, these people were 
  not so much born as assembled,
  their normal empathy killed off by years of soft living, brainwashing by 
  political correctitude and
  cheap trashy TV and all the rest of the post-modernist baggage of "kool 
  Britannia"- a country 
  I have come to loathe. Their dulled 
  senses, beguiled by years of MSM bullshit and much else
  in the same ilk are incapable of realising 
  how far gone we areas a country towards destruction.
  

  In many way Social Climber Man has done me 
  a huge favour. I join a long and growing list of similar
  ejectees who simply put UKIP's nose "out of 
  joint" for telling "it as it is", by being emotional and 
  rather 
  angry about where we are headed and the 
  lack of public but especially political reaction to it. Many,
  if not most of my UKIP readers support my 
  stance on Islam, including colleagues of "Social Climber Man"
  that saw fit to have me 
banned.
  

  Anyway I don't bear grudges. I am not a 
  politician, but a scholar and patriot and I shall leave the 
former
  to small minded men like the above. UKIP 
  will do itself no favours by acting as it has done and I shall
  ensure that my readership know too. In 
  effect UKIP has "bought" into the status quo and become
  mainstream. By "currying" the Islamic vote, 
  it effectually guarantees to aid and abet our slow assimilation
  into Islam.
  

  Maybe in times not yet with us-these people 
  will come to realise, that banning opinions they don't
  like, or that may "offend" is no way to 
  save the country or themselves. The threat of Islam is real, 
  bloody
  dangerous and we are losing and UKIP will 
  simply be one more promise of release, that joined the rest on 
the
  the road to national 
perdition.
  

  Guy Leven-Torres
  
=                                                                               
                                          

Other related posts: