[patriots] Child sex inquiry into MP ‘blocked by senior police.
- From: annette rose smith <annette-rose-smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 22:29:31 +0100
From Face Book
Michael Doherty
Child sex inquiry into MP ‘blocked by senior police.
An investigation into child abuse allegations against a prominent politician
25 years ago was blocked, one of the country’s most senior police officers has
revealed.
Mick Creedon, chief constable of Derbyshire, told The Times that he was a
detective sergeant in 1989 when he was ordered to limit his inquiries into
Greville Janner, a leading Labour backbench MP. Mr Creedon said there was
“credible evidence” against the MP, now Lord Janner of Braunstone, QC, that
warranted further investigation, but he was given orders forbidding an arrest
or a search of his home or offices.
“The decision was a clear one — he will be interviewed by appointment and there
won’t be a search of his home address or his constituency office or his office
in the House of Commons,” Mr Creedon said.
The order was “conveyed” by a superintendent but Mr Creedon believes it came
from chief officers. He added: “It was a decision made by people more senior
than me.”
The allegations against Lord Janner, 86, who was a senior Labour backbencher
and president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, surfaced during the
police investigation into Frank Beck, the manager of Leicester children’s homes
who died in jail after being convicted of abusing boys in his care.
A former resident of one home alleged that he had had a two-year sexual
relationship with the MP when he was a teenager in the 1970s. The alleged
victim later aired the allegations in public when he gave evidence at Beck’s
trial in 1991.
However, Mr Creedon said there were concerns about the credibility of the
evidence against Lord Janner, notably that the key witness was in thrall to
Beck despite being the victim of abuse.
The alleged victim also gave evidence for Beck. None of the other hundreds of
residents interviewed mde any allegations against the MP.
The witness had produced affectionate letters that were allegedly from the MP,
some on House of Commons notepaper, and provided a detailed description of the
inside of the MP’s Hampstead home. Mr Creedon said: “I look at this now, as a
chief constable, as a senior investigating officer, in the light of many
inquiries before and since — and one of the lines of inquiry could have been to
search the house.
“My view has always been that the allegations were very serious, there was
enough evidence to put a file before the CPS [Crown Prosecution Service], and
as investigating officers our job was to search out as much evidence as
possible to prove or disprove the offence. My interpretation of the Police and
Criminal Evidence Act would be that under the circumstances it would have been
justified to search the house [and] offices.”
He said he did not know who made the decision to limit the investigation.
The 1989-91 inquiry was limited to an interview at Leicestershire police
headquarters during which Lord Janner gave “no comment” answers.
A file was sent to the CPS, which decided there was insufficient evidence to
bring charges.
When the allegations became public during Beck’s trial in 1991, the jury was
told they were a “red herring” and not relevant to the case. Lord Janner later
said there was “not a shred of truth” in the allegations against him.
Those allegations are central to a new police investigation into Lord Janner
and others, called Operation Enamel, which has led to warrants being obtained
to search the peer’s home in north London and his office in the House of Lords.
The peer, who is in poor health, has never been arrested and has not been
interviewed by detectives from the new investigation. His lawyers did not
respond to requests for comment.
UnlikeUnlike · · ShareYou and 33 others like this.24 sharesRemoveMichael
Doherty Still think the law applies equally to all?When it's clear the LAW does
not apply equally THERE IS NO LAW11 hrs · Like · 14RemoveMinxy Minx It's been
said before,if he has dementia and can't be prosecuted for his crimes,then why
is he still working.....lies!11 hrs · Like · 7RemoveBernee Boopy Bailey
....BELIEVED THIS FOR THE LONGEST TIME MICHAEL.....THERE IS NO EQUALITY IN THE
LAW.......IMBALANCED FROM THE OUTSET!.....11 hrs · Like · 6RemoveEdward Beck
I've got a letter from a disgraced Deputy Chief Constable, stating that "the
Common Law does not apply to you, and that is a fact" , and "Dumfries and
Galloway is under the rule of policy ".He also dislikes old laws and confirms
he believes constitutional statutes can be "impliedly repealed" and just
ignores court rulings to the contrary.10 hrs · Like · 1RemovePeter Boland It's
the police who decide who is guilty. If they want you convicted they put you
before the court of they want to protect you they refuse to gather
"Evidence."10 hrs · Like · 9RemoveTibor Kracher Goes to show the pigs are in on
it too. To the gallows you shower of uniformed shit!10 hrs · Like ·
2RemoveTerry Allen Whoever gave him that order committed a crime of aiding and
abetting Janner. No Excuses he should be brought to trail put in jail and then
they should throw the key away.10 hrs · Like · 2RemoveTibor Kracher Terry,
completely agree with ya. Coming from Leicester rumours have been rife for
years. Time to put wrongs right. We now know the police are bent fucks. So
it'll be us and them come the revolution!10 hrs · Like · 2RemoveYvonne
Stewart-Taylor Ad when you fight back and win they say you were fortunate to
have got off after they stitch you up hide evidence in defense etc, litigant in
person works well when you know how to deal with this thuggery10 hrs · Like ·
2RemoveJulie Lowe Well Done Mike Creedon.10 hrs · Like · 1RemoveClive Pritchard
Mike Creedon is by his own word guilty for fucks sake! Just following orders
does not cut it.10 hrs · Like · 2RemoveAlex Doonan Another one slips the net
allowed to grow old gracefully on full perks - 'The peer, who is in poor
health, has never been arrested and has not been interviewed by detectives from
the new investigation. His lawyers did not respond to requests for comment.'10
hrs · Like · 2RemoveNigel Beckwith Yet Dave Lee Travis is to be sentenced for
groping a woman's blouse in a "He said she said" claim of abuse (one word
against another, not at all beyond reasonable doubt). To all those who say we
have a fair justice system I say...remember Santa Claus.....9 hrs · Edited ·
Like · 4RemoveEgg Guney Why8 hrs · Like · 1RemoveDarryl Baker Say no more, we
knew it would happen.2 hrs · Like
Other related posts:
- » [patriots] Child sex inquiry into MP ‘blocked by senior police. - annette rose smith
