Re: to_number question (excellent thread)

I'm sorry I didn't have time to look at this thread
when it was live - a quick check through a small
section of its history makes interesting reading.

My only contribution, Dan, is that you missed
out a couple of classifications:

4)    how the designer specified it
5)    how Oracle Marketing thinks it works

Regards

Jonathan Lewis

http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ

http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html
Optimising Oracle Seminar - schedule updated July 14th



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Daniel Fink" <Daniel.Fink@xxxxxxx>
To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: to_number question (excellent thread)


Umm...I did not really intend it to be humorous... (don't worry, no offense
taken)

In my current and past research and daily tasks, I am encountering all 3
classifications. My first exposure to this was my work on
rollback segments. I quickly realized that there was a lot of mythology and
lack of understanding, strongly supported by
documentation, papers and presentations. When I really dove in to 9i
Automatic Undo, it was reinforced.

Have a good weekend,
Daniel


Jonathan Gennick wrote:
> Friday, July 16, 2004, 3:44:19 PM, Daniel Fink (Daniel.Fink@xxxxxxx)
wrote:
> DF> I might add that there are three classifications on reality
> DF> 1) how you want it to work
> DF> 2) how the masses believe it to work
> DF> 3) how it really works
>


----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts: