Re: select counts versus insert/select counts
- From: "Rumpi Gravenstein" <rgravens@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Rob.Dempsey@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:10:01 -0400
That's an excellent idea - I've seen this as well. If the index is
corrupted, the indexed search will not return the correct results. In my
case rebuilding the index fixed the issue.
On 10/19/07, Rob Dempsey <Rob.Dempsey@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I have seen different counts when there is an index on the table and
> oracle has not maintained the index.
>
> Check what the execution plan is. If it is using a index then try the
> same SQL with a /*+ FULL(t)*/ hint
>
> Rob
>
>
- References:
- select counts versus insert/select counts
- From: Michael . Coll-Barth
- RE: select counts versus insert/select counts
- From: Rob Dempsey
Other related posts:
- » select counts versus insert/select counts
- » RE: select counts versus insert/select counts
- » Re: select counts versus insert/select counts
- » RE: select counts versus insert/select counts
- » Re: select counts versus insert/select counts
- » RE: select counts versus insert/select counts
- » Re: select counts versus insert/select counts
- » Re: select counts versus insert/select counts
- select counts versus insert/select counts
- From: Michael . Coll-Barth
- RE: select counts versus insert/select counts
- From: Rob Dempsey