re: ordering tables changes cost/plan in 9.2.0.6
- From: cosmin ioan <cosmini@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:13:55 -0800 (PST)
hello all,
I was under the impression that one would not have to worry about the table
order in an OPTIMIZER_MODE=CHOOSE type query. I was recently presented with a
query whereby the cost did not change that much, but the plan did change
drastically by just changing the tables' order in the "FROM" clause.
What can I infer from this? Is this "phenomenon" pretty widespread?
thx,
Cos
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ordering tables changes cost/plan in 9.2.0.6
- From: Jonathan Lewis
- re: ordering tables changes cost/plan in 9.2.0.6
- From: Carel-Jan Engel
Other related posts:
- » re: ordering tables changes cost/plan in 9.2.0.6
- » Re: ordering tables changes cost/plan in 9.2.0.6
- » re: ordering tables changes cost/plan in 9.2.0.6
- » Re: ordering tables changes cost/plan in 9.2.0.6
- » re: ordering tables changes cost/plan in 9.2.0.6
- » re: ordering tables changes cost/plan in 9.2.0.6
- Re: ordering tables changes cost/plan in 9.2.0.6
- From: Jonathan Lewis
- re: ordering tables changes cost/plan in 9.2.0.6
- From: Carel-Jan Engel