RE: object privilege granted to public a sox problem? (and others)
- From: "Michael Fontana" <mfontana@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <cjnewman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <dcowles@xxxxxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:14:14 -0600 (CST)
Chris Newman wrote: >Be very careful implementing any of the changes Oracle is calling >'Violations'. Chances are, they will horribly break your application. But of course it will certainly be SOX compliant! There are additional levels of security you can place on your oracle database, including some new features in 11g, which might get you closer to the goal without breaking anything, but, in all seriousness, if you're apps were not created with SOX and security in mind, it's doubtful you'll ever fully get there without considerable change and effort! -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- RE: object privilege granted to public a sox problem? (and others)
- From: Newman, Christopher
- RE: object privilege granted to public a sox problem? (and others)
Other related posts:
- » object privilege granted to public a sox problem? (and others) - Douglas Cowles
- » RE: object privilege granted to public a sox problem? (and others) - Newman, Christopher
- » RE: object privilege granted to public a sox problem? (and others) - Michael Fontana
- » Re: object privilege granted to public a sox problem? (and others) - Andrew Kerber
- » RE: object privilege granted to public a sox problem? (and others) - Bellows, Bambi \(Comsys\)
- » Re: object privilege granted to public a sox problem? (and others) - Gus Spier
- » Re: object privilege granted to public a sox problem? (and others) - William Robertson
- » Re: object privilege granted to public a sox problem? (and others) - Pete Finnigan