Randy, my personal opinion on your question is: - provided you have sized your IO back-end correctly in term of throughput and random IOs - provided that you can have enough 10GbE ports on the storage and servers and the storage network is distinct from the general purpose network - then Oracle D-NFS is a very good solution for accessing your NetApp storage We have observed that: - (compared to non D-NFS usage), D-NFS uses less CPU on the database server hosts (note that D-NFS is for Oracle 11.1 and later) - stability with NFS/D-NFS is excellent (no OCR/voting disk as mentioned, never seen anything like this in the past 5 years and we run several tens of RAC clusters 2 to 4 nodes) - the solution is extremely simple: just mount with right options 359515.1 (checking options is not even needed with D-NFS for datafiles) - making use of storage level "advanced" features is really a time / effort saving. Restoring a multi TB database without snapshot can be very long, so I recommend to use the features of your storage when you will be familiar enough with it. We (CERN, Geneva) currently use Oracle on NetApp with NFS (10.2) or D-NFS (11.2) on RAC with very good return on experience. Let me know if you want to talk about it. cheers Eric PS: as mentioned by Freek, as far as I know, OL6/RHEL6 is not certified for 11.2 (I have just checked again). Would I be you, I would not go on a non-certified path but use the latest of the OL5/RHEL5 OS with the latest updates On 28 November 2011 18:36, Steiner, Randy <Randy.Steiner@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > > I am migrating a 10g data warehouse to new blade servers with netapp > storage. The netapp best practice guide suggests using asm for only the > cluster files, but Oracle says I should be using asm for datafiles and > log files. Is anyone using NetApp with or without asm that could offer > a suggestion? > > > > Thanks > > Randy > > > > > -- > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > > > -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l