Personal suggestion would be to try a supported combination to verify that this is indeed a bug. You can get 'supported' versions from Oracle or CentOs to try it out.
If I remember correctly, the kernel memory reporting structures was one area that changed between 2.6.18 and 2.6.32. That could account for the challenge.
/Hans On 15/07/2014 8:20 AM, Oliver wrote:
I'm sorry. It is red hat enterprise 6.5 64-bit. Oracle software 64-bit too. I know that it isn't supported,I've used -ignoresysprereqs in the installation.Thanks beforehand.El 15/07/2014 13:57, "Hans Forbrich" <fuzzy.graybeard@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:fuzzy.graybeard@xxxxxxxxx>> escribió:First questions that come to mind: Which Linux distro & version? 32-bit or 64-bit Linux? /Hans On 15/07/2014 5:24 AM, Oliver wrote: Hi, I've installed 10201 on a linux server (x86_64), only binaries. I've installed then 10205 patchset and I'm trying create a new database now with dbca. The problem that I'm seeing is that in the memory section, I'm putting 40% of percentage, it shows correctly total physical memory (64424MB), but when I access to "show memory distribution", it shows that will use 8008 as total memory for Oracle ... 1536MB SGA, 6432MB PGA and oracle process size 40MB. What's happening? 40% of 64GB isn't 8GB .. Thanks beforehand. Cheers... -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
