RE: intel clusters in a box
- From: "Marquez, Chris" <CMarquez@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:16:31 -0500
For personal use anything is game;=20
2.2, 2.4, 2.6...or 2.5, 2.7 if you like.
But for (RAC) Oracle...Oracle documentation=20
is very specific about wich kernel you *will* use.
Chris Marquez
Oracle DBA
HEYMONitor(tm) - heymonitor.com
"Oracle Monitoring & Alerting Solution"
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Mladen Gogala
Sent: Fri 1/21/2005 4:50 PM
To: jkstill@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: stellr@xxxxxxxxxx; Don Granaman; oracle-l
Subject: Re: intel clusters in a box
Jared Still wrote:
>You left out an important component: the Linux vendor.
>
>Suse should be given serious consideration. It is in many
>respects superior to RedHat.
>
>For starters, they use the 2.6 kernel rather than =
hacking^H^H^H^Hporting
>new features into the 2.4 kernel.
>
>Jared
> =20
>
I must say that I like their evil ways with the kernel. So far, I've had =
loads of trouble with 2.6 kernel. I upgraded my FC3 box to 2.6.10 and, =
immediately, my linux-wlan-ng stopped working (the new kernel changed
the driver interface, and it fails to load) so I have to use orinoco =
which doesn't support WEP. Fun with nvidia drivers and 2.6 kernel is =
very well known, an the same goes for the ALSA drivers. Staying with 2.4
is a very smart move if we want a stable OS. The latest 2.6 kernel still =
has ways to go before maturing to acceptable level. I switched from 2.2
to 2.4 when 2.4.14 appeared on the market. I don't consider SuSE's =
eagerness to start proliferating the 2.6 version as a laudable move.
-=20
Mladen Gogala
Oracle DBA
Ext. 121
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
