Re: block change tracking?
- From: "Amaral, Rui" <Rui.Amaral@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'howard.latham@xxxxxxxxx'" <howard.latham@xxxxxxxxx>, "'John.Hallas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <John.Hallas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 09:02:14 -0400
Same here. I have used it for some time with good results though I have not
used it on standbys
From: Howard Latham [mailto:howard.latham@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 08:47 AM
To: John.Hallas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <John.Hallas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: TESTAJ3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <TESTAJ3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: block change tracking?
So Surprised by Question I thought I had missed something. Yes its great
reduces size of backup. Restores work fine.
Best thing since sliced partitions.
On 3 November 2010 12:32, John Hallas
<John.Hallas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:John.Hallas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Use it as standard on all our production databases. No reason not to in my
view. It certainly helps resource utilisation
John
________________________________
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On
Behalf Of TESTAJ3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:TESTAJ3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 02 November 2010 20:18
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: block change tracking?
Anyone using it successfully? I see a blog:
http://sai-oracle.blogspot.com/2010/09/beware-of-data-loss-in-bct-based-rman.html
but it read only as an issue with standby databases?
thanks, joe
_______________________________________
Joe Testa, Oracle Certified Professional
Senior Engineering & Administration Lead
(Work) 614-677-1668
(Cell) 614-312-6715
______________________________________________________________________
Wm Morrison Supermarkets Plc is registered in England with number 358949. The
registered office of the company is situated at Gain Lane, Bradford, West
Yorkshire BD3 7DL. This email and any attachments are intended for the
addressee(s) only and may be confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please inform the sender by replying to
the email that you have received in error and then destroy the email.
If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy or rely
on the email or its attachments in any way.
This email does not constitute a contract in writing for the purposes of the
Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989.
Our Standard Terms and Conditions of Purchase, as may be amended from time to
time, apply to any contract that we enter into. The current version of our
Standard Terms and Conditions of Purchase is available at:
http://www.morrisons.co.uk/gscop
Although we have taken steps to ensure the email and its attachments are
virus-free, we cannot guarantee this or accept any responsibility,
and it is the responsibility of recipients to carry out their own virus checks.
______________________________________________________________________
--
Howard A. Latham
Sent from my Nokia N97
NOTICE: Confidential message which may be privileged. Unauthorized
use/disclosure prohibited. If received in error, go to www.td.com/legal for
instructions.
AVIS : Message confidentiel dont le contenu peut être privilégié.
Utilisation/divulgation interdites sans permission. Si reçu par erreur, allez
au www.td.com/francais/avis_juridique pour des instructions.
Other related posts:
