RE: Use the same database release on the primary and standby databases
- From: "Mark W. Farnham" <mwf@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <wellmetus@xxxxxxxxx>, "'April Sims'" <sims@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 12:46:08 -0500
For any point release this is *likely* to work in a given test, but there is
a PROBLEM.
The problem is that unless Oracle declared that a given point release had no
changes to existing output possibilities to redo logs in support of any
fixed or new features, you would be faced with the possibility of records in
the new redo logs that would not be understood correctly in the older
release. So even if you tested a substantial set you would have no
reasonable expectation of reliability.
Regards,
mwf
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Roger Xu
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 10:55 AM
To: April Sims
Cc: vishal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Use the same database release on the primary and standby
databases
It should work but the Oracle Document says the release has to be the same.
Has anyone in the list done this? Thanks!
>
>>
>> It is possible to run 9.2.0.8.0 at primary and 9.2.0.7.0 at logical
standby?
>>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
