Re: Temporary table vs pl\sql table
- From: Johan Eriksson <johan.eriksson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: AmihayG@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:30:38 +0100
Hi
when reading your post it sounds like you could benefit from using a
materialized view instead?
/johan
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 10:42 +0200, Amihay Gonen wrote:
> Hi , I've a process which need to do a lot of processing (summaries)
> on a large set of data.
>
> The main flow is as follow:
>
> copy the new rows since last run (up to defined row count) to a
> temporary table.
> Run various selects with group by on the temporary table and
> merge them into summary table.
>
> I wander (I will conduct some tests ofcourse ) what type of temporary
> table will be better:
>
> 1) create ... temporary table or ...
> 2) create type test is table of
>
> The first option has more i/o and go throw the buffer cache , but
> doesn't consume a lot of memory
> the second option doesn't has I/O but consume more memory for the PGA.
>
> Any ideas ?
>
>
>
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Temporary table vs pl\sql table
- From: Amihay Gonen
- References:
- Temporary table vs pl\sql table
- From: Amihay Gonen
Other related posts:
- RE: Temporary table vs pl\sql table
- From: Amihay Gonen
- Temporary table vs pl\sql table
- From: Amihay Gonen