RE: Subject: RE: Tuning issue, 10046 trace and Scheduled Jobs

  • From: Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: kennaim@xxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:48:18 -0700

Is it possible that setting the statistics for the GTT tables fails when run as a scheduled job. If the optimizer assumes that the GTTs are empty that could explain that it goes for an NL join. I have seen that happening a lot in the Peoplesoft environment with its "temporary" tables ( not GTTs but real tables which usually are empty, especially when the weekly stats job runs :-( )


At 03:33 PM 11/21/2006, Ken Naim wrote:
I apologize, I changed the scenario on you to narrow the scope of the issue
down, I took out the third table and just did a full outer join of two of
the tables and got the same poor execution, just it took 15 minutes (instead
of 35) now for the two tables.

I am not sure if the oracle scheduler would is changing the session
parameters, how can I check?

Based on what you were saying about the nested loops I looked back at some
code I wrote a while back that this code was loosely based on and compared
them and found that my old code had GTT's with primary keys and my new ones
didn't so I added them and the code now runs with a an index read instead of
a full scan under the filter section which now runs in the normal 10
seconds.

It is just so odd that the scheduler caused it to do nested loops instead of
a full scan and the explain plan didn't even show it.

I appreciate your effort not only in helping me resolve this issue, but in
educating me how to handle these issues in the future.

Regards

Wolfgang Breitling
Centrex Consulting Corporation
www.centrexcc.com


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


Other related posts: