Shareplex is cheeper than Goldengate?! Everyone in this thread has been saying how expensive Shareplex is. On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Connor McDonald <mcdonald.connor@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > *Why would someone choose Shareplex over Goldengate?* > > $20K per cpu might be a reason :-) > > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:58 AM, kyle Hailey <kylelf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> Goldengate vs Shareplex >> Why would someone choose Shareplex over Goldengate? >> >> just curious, not really in the market. >> >> - Kyle >> http://dboptimizer.com >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Vishal Gupta <vishal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: >> >>> I have used Shareplex in past back in 9i and 10g days when Oracle AQ >>> could scale up to replicate 10-15million transaction/day and still keep data >>> latency low. Shareplex was great for Oracle to Oracle replication. I dont >>> know about the price though. >>> >>> If you are looking for something cross RDBMS, then you could also go for >>> GoldenGate. >>> >>> >>> On 27 Jul 2011, at 17:07, Amaral, Rui wrote: >>> >>> > We had it at my previous employer a few years ago as well. It worked >>> but expensive and a bit of a memory hog in our environment. >>> > >>> > -----Original Message----- >>> > From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>> oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bill Ferguson >>> > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 12:05 PM >>> > To: RStorey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> > Cc: oracle-l-freelists >>> > Subject: Re: Shareplex >>> > >>> > Tried it several years ago and finally dropped it. It was SUPER >>> > expensive, and we (myself and the Quest folks) could never get it to >>> > work correctly with Oracle 10g and Windows 2003 Server. Everything >>> > they tried still failed, so after spending $65K on it and over a year >>> > of effort, we dropped it. >>> > >>> > You are also prety much correct in what it does, though the setup for >>> > it was far less than dataguard. >>> > >>> > -- >>> > -- Bill Ferguson >>> > -- >>> > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > NOTICE: Confidential message which may be privileged. Unauthorized >>> use/disclosure prohibited. If received in error, please go to >>> www.td.com/legal for instructions. >>> > AVIS : Message confidentiel dont le contenu peut être privilégié. >>> Utilisation/divulgation interdites sans permission. Si reçu par erreur, >>> prière d'aller au www.td.com/francais/avis_juridique pour des >>> instructions. >>> > -- >>> > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l >>> > >>> > >>> >>> -- >>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l >>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Connor McDonald > =========================== > email: connor_mcdonald@xxxxxxxxx > web: http://www.oracledba.co.uk > > "Semper in excremento, sole profundum qui variat" >