RE: SQL Server vs. Oracle
- From: "Goulet, Dick" <DGoulet@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 10:20:23 -0400
Regrettably they did not add in the savings if one is using Linux vs. =
Windoze.
Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA
Oracle Certified 8i DBA
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Thomas [mailto:mhthomas@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 8:50 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SQL Server vs. Oracle
My favorite part:
"Businesses can save approximately $32,600 per DBA per
year by using Oracle Database 10g in place of
Microsoft SQL Server 2000."
OMG. :-)
Regards,
Mike Thomas
--- Leslie Tierstein
<Leslie.Tierstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> See:
>
http://www.progstrat.com/research/gems/040401rdbmscmcs.pdf
>=20
=09
=09
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - Buy advance tickets for 'Shrek 2'
http://movies.yahoo.com/showtimes/movie?mid=3D1808405861=20
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
