RE: SQL Server vs. Oracle

Regrettably they did not add in the savings if one is using Linux vs. =
Windoze.

Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA
Oracle Certified 8i DBA

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Thomas [mailto:mhthomas@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 8:50 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SQL Server vs. Oracle


My favorite part:

"Businesses can save approximately $32,600 per DBA per
year by using Oracle Database 10g in place of
Microsoft SQL Server 2000."

OMG. :-)

Regards,

Mike Thomas

--- Leslie Tierstein
<Leslie.Tierstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> See:
>
http://www.progstrat.com/research/gems/040401rdbmscmcs.pdf
>=20



=09
        =09
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - Buy advance tickets for 'Shrek 2'
http://movies.yahoo.com/showtimes/movie?mid=3D1808405861=20
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts: