RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- From: "Michael Fontana" <mfontana@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:44:05 -0500
Psoft=no
Siebel=no
When I ran SAP on 8.1.7 (about 2 years ago) also=no
Michael Fontana
Sr. DBA
NTT/Verio
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jared Still
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 12:22 PM
To: Oracle-L Freelists
Subject: RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 09:10, Wolfson Larry - lwolfs wrote:
> Thanks Guys!
>
> Anyone with SAP or Peoplesoft do this?
>
SAP: no
everything else: also no
Jared
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put
'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
- References:
- RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- From: Jared Still
Other related posts:
- » SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » Re: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » Re: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » Re: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » Re: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » Re: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » Re: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- » RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- RE: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
- From: Jared Still