Re: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?

From: Michael Thomas <mhthomas@xxxxxxxxx>
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:54:07 -0700 (PDT)

--- Paul Drake <discgolfdba@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
> i hAD hEARD tHAT iN 10g tHE dICTIONARY iS cOST-bASED
> aND tHAT tHE sYS sCHEMA sHOULD hAVE sTATISTICS
> gATHERED fOR iT. dUNNO aBOUT 9.2, nOT cURRENTLY
> gATHERING sTATS fOR iT. 
> 
> pD
> 
...

Was this a joke in reference to the subject BEING IN
ALL CAPS? ;-)

Regards,

Mike Thomas


        
                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

References:

Re: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?
From: Paul Drake

Re: SHOULD WE ANALYZE 9.2 SYS tables?

Other related posts: