RE: Recovery excitement ...
- From: "Mark W. Farnham" <mwf@xxxxxxxx>
- To: "Oracle-L" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:08:07 -0500
hmm. okay. Oracle's advice sounds wrong, but maybe they have details I don't
have.
Did you possibly restore on-line logs from your tapes? Now at first blush it
would not make sense that they are of a higher sequence number, but if you
had an intervening open resetlogs that could be the case.
If you've overwritten your REAL online logs, then you'll be losing the
changes in them and will have to resort to reset logs.
If those higher numbered logs really are older despite the higher numbers
for sequence (due to the intervening hypothetical reset), then bad things
could happen if you figure out a way to get them to apply.
Of course you made a copy of your online logs immediately before you began
the restore/recovery process, so you can just put those back in place and
try again, right? After all, backing up the online logs is the first step of
any recovery, because that is the thing you can't get them from anywhere on
your backups.
Regards,
mwf
-----Original Message-----
From: Spears, Brian [mailto:BSpears@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 2:34 PM
To: Mark W. Farnham
Subject: RE: Recovery excitement ...
No funny..its not backup controlfiles...
Oracle is telling me just to recreate controlfiles from trace files and the
sequence should be in sync.
Brian
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark W. Farnham [mailto:mwf@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:42 PM
To: Spears, Brian
Subject: RE: Recovery excitement ...
expected lower than actual usually means you're doing a recovery with a
backup controlfile.
Did you tell the database you were using a backup controlfile?
Probably you can cancel recovery and start it again with the correct
command.
If you're doing a complete recovery you should *NOT* need to reset.
Good luck
mwf
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Spears, Brian
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:30 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Recovery excitement ...
I tell you ...days before holidays and Fridays are the worst for having to
do restores.
I have a 600gig windows database :) yes 600GB.. That says..
Database Buffers 1073741824 bytes
Redo Buffers 4104192 bytes
Database mounted.
ORA-00314: log 2 of thread 1, expected sequence# 46671 doesn't match 51245
ORA-00312: online log 2 thread 1: 'G:\ORACLE\LTSPXBR\ORALOGS\REDO02B.LOG'
ORA-00314: log 2 of thread 1, expected sequence# 46671 doesn't match 51245
ORA-00312: online log 2 thread 1: 'F:\ORACLE\LTSPXBR\ORALOGS\REDO02A.LOG'
SQL> select * from v$log;
GROUP# THREAD# SEQUENCE# BYTES MEMBERS ARC STATUS
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --- ----------------
FIRST_CHANGE# FIRST_TIM
------------- ---------
1 1 46669 134217728 2 YES INACTIVE
2337739049 05-NOV-04
2 1 46671 134217728 2 NO CURRENT
2337739053 05-NOV-04
3 1 46670 134217728 2 NO INACTIVE
2337739051 05-NOV-04
Any tricks... Out there.. Recover/cancel resetlogs..anybody do that before?
We just put in our Rman solution... Just in time!
Brian
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Gogala, Mladen
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:56 AM
To: 'shrekdba@xxxxxxxxx'; reginald.w.bailey@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: meenakshi.aggarwal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: silly vi question
Another version of "vi" for Winduhs can be found at www.cygwin.com. Install
everything and you'll get vim for Winduhs. It can make your Winduhs look
half way decent. Here are commands that you don't frequently see on a
Winduhs workstation: $ uname -a CYGWIN_NT-5.1 SVetsa-IT 1.5.12(0.116/4/2)
2004-11-10 08:34 i686 unknown unknown Cygwin
$ ls -l /usr/bin/vi
lrwxrwxrwx 1 MGogala Users 7 Nov 24 09:37 /usr/bin/vi ->
vim.exe
MGogala@SVetsa-IT /cygdrive/c/tmp
--
Mladen Gogala
Ext. 121
-----Original Message-----
From: Shrek [mailto:shrekdba@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:49 AM
To: reginald.w.bailey@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: meenakshi.aggarwal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: silly vi question
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:33:11 -0600, reginald.w.bailey@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<reginald.w.bailey@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Where do you download the WinVI from?
VIM is better.
www.vim.org
has syntax highlighting built in and comes with it already set up.
--
--
Bill "Shrek" Thater ORACLE DBA
shrekdba@xxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am my beloved's, and my beloved is mine (Song of
Solomon 6:3)
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
