RE: REPLICATION
- From: Carel-Jan Engel <cjpengel.dbalert@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 22:02:36 +0200
Apologies Steve, I was too short in my phrasing, and should have put some
more effort in the right wording.
What I meant is: do not use a LSB database as DR database. Your idea of
having two databases for the two purposes is OK. LSB in 9i just isn't
stable enough (when running more complexity than a demo schema) to serve as
a proper DR-site.
At 10:42 AM 6/30/2004 -0600, you wrote:
>Regarding...=20
> > I wouldn't go for the LSB/DR combination on 9i.=20
>Why not? I was just getting ready to try this exact same thing. (i.e.
>implement a Physical standby and a logical standby.)
>
>
>TIA,
>Steve Orr
>Bozeman, Montana
Regards, Carel-Jan
===
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. (Derek Bok)
===
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
- References:
- RE: REPLICATION
- From: Orr, Steve
Other related posts:
- » REPLICATION
- » Re: REPLICATION
- » RE: REPLICATION
- » Re: REPLICATION
- » RE: REPLICATION
- » RE: REPLICATION
- » RE: REPLICATION
- » RE: REPLICATION
- » RE: REPLICATION
- » RE: REPLICATION
- » RE: REPLICATION
- » Re: REPLICATION
- » Re: REPLICATION
- RE: REPLICATION
- From: Orr, Steve