Re: Performance issue after creating higher block size tablespace - a further question
- From: Greg Rahn <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: jkstill@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:39:44 -0800
I'll be glad to provide the details:
http://structureddata.org/2008/09/08/understanding-performance/
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Personally, I no longer find this interesting, but simply tiresome.
>
> It has long since been shown that these results were due to a bug.
>
> Sorry, can't remember the details, and not really interested in
> digging them up.
>
> Anyone that feels like tweaking block sizes as a tuning method
> is free to do so, though for the life of me I can't see why when
> these results are found that the individual investigating it would
> not dig down the the real reason for the results.
>
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Andrew Kerber <andrew.kerber@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> The Oracle Alchemist has an interesting blog on this topic:
>>
>> http://www.oraclealchemist.com/oracle/hey-guys-does-size-matter/
--
Regards,
Greg Rahn
http://structureddata.org
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
