Re: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- From: "Jared Still" <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: EPanosian@xxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 10:34:34 -0800
On 12/1/06, David Litchfield <dwlitchfield@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
p.s. The NULL Dacl problems are not Microsoft's fault before anyone blames
them...
subinacle.exe is a very powerful tool for reporting on ACLS
and setting them to appropriate values.
It can be found at MS support site.
--
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- From: David Litchfield
- References:
- Re: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- From: David Litchfield
Other related posts:
- » Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- » Re: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- » Re: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- » Re: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- » Re: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- » RE: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- » RE: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- » RE: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- » Re: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- » Re: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
p.s. The NULL Dacl problems are not Microsoft's fault before anyone blames them...
- Re: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- From: David Litchfield
- Re: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- From: David Litchfield