Re: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- From: David Litchfield <dwlitchfield@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: jkstill@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 20:54:53 +0000 (GMT)
Hi Jared,
>>On 12/1/06, David Litchfield <dwlitchfield@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>p.s. The NULL Dacl problems are not Microsoft's fault before anyone blames
>>them...
>subinacle.exe is a very powerful tool for reporting on ACLS
>and setting them to appropriate values.
>It can be found at MS support site.
Unfortunately, when a new connection is made new threads are created with a
NULL dacl so subinacl.exe unfortunately can't help here. Besides, if the main
Oracle process and thread objects didn't have a NULL dacl I wonder what would
break :/
Cheers,
David
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
- References:
- Re: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- From: Jared Still
Other related posts:
- » Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- » Re: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- » Re: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- » Re: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- » Re: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- » RE: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- » RE: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- » RE: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- » Re: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- » Re: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- Re: Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 -- Vulnerability Question
- From: Jared Still