Ok, so now I'm confused a bit and I think I'm probably several mental steps behind you on this one so bear with me: First: db_file_multiblock_read_count=16 Systems Stats have been gathered (always one of the first things I do when taking over a system) Second: I ran the non-indexes query multiple times - if the table was nearly completely cached, wouldn't the access times improve on the non-indexed query as well? (There's probably some other considerations here that I'm missing/not thinking about) Third: Why doesn't Oracle choose the Index and Drive the NL to get the 159K rows on its own? Regards, Chris -----Original Message----- From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jonathan Lewis Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 12:26 PM To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Need some 10053 Guidance to help me solve a puzzler You don't need to look at the 10053 to answer your question - the answer you need is in the execution plan. The indexed access path shows Oracle estimating 159K rows at line 3 (driving the NL). This gives an index access cost of 2 for each row (branch + leaf) plus two more for the table (2 random rows for each driving row). 159K * 4 = 636K, which the CBO treats as assumed random disk reads (there's a fairly obvious algorithm error there relating to index caching, and a less obvious defect relating to table caching). The table scan path shows a cost of 165K which (combined with the reads of 682K) make me think the table is probably about 682K blocks and largely uncached, and that your system stats and db_file_multiblock_read_count are left at default. The dramatic difference in cost between the 165K and the 636K is enough to overwhelm any other factor in the costing; and the fact that the table is nearly completely cached for the indexed access path gives you the vastly better time compared to the estimate. Regards Jonathan Lewis http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/all_postings Author: Oracle Core (Apress 2011) http://www.apress.com/9781430239543 ----- Original Message ----- -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l