Re: Inconsistent SQL tuning results
- From: John Kanagaraj <john.kanagaraj@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: michaeljmoore <michaeljmoore@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 09:58:41 -0800
Why guess when you can know for sure! > So my question is: What might account for the huge difference in run time > between the first run and successive runs? Just run a "Cary" trace (10046 level 12) on the runs and look at the difference in where time is spent? -- John Kanagaraj <>< http://www.linkedin.com/in/johnkanagaraj http://jkanagaraj.wordpress.com (Sorry - not an Oracle blog!) ** The opinions and facts contained in this message are entirely mine and do not reflect those of my employer or customers ** -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- Inconsistent SQL tuning results
- From: Michael Moore
- Inconsistent SQL tuning results
Other related posts:
- » Inconsistent SQL tuning results - Michael Moore
- » Re: Inconsistent SQL tuning results - Cary Millsap
- » Re: Inconsistent SQL tuning results - John Kanagaraj
- » Re: Inconsistent SQL tuning results - Daniel W. Fink
- » Re: Inconsistent SQL tuning results - Michael Moore
- » Re: Inconsistent SQL tuning results - Wolfgang Breitling
- » Re: Inconsistent SQL tuning results - Wolfgang Breitling
- » Re: Inconsistent SQL tuning results - Andrew Kerber
- » Re: Inconsistent SQL tuning results - Cary Millsap
- » Re: Inconsistent SQL tuning results - Michael Moore
- » RE: Inconsistent SQL tuning results - D'Hooge Freek
- » Re: Inconsistent SQL tuning results - Michael Moore
- » Re: Inconsistent SQL tuning results - Ron Crisco
- » Re: Inconsistent SQL tuning results - Michael Moore