In a BIND again...
- From: "Sweetser, Joe" <JSweetser@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:31:09 -0600
Forgot to include the list in the reply... bind 5: dty=180 mxl=11(11) mal=00 scl=00 pre=00 oacflg=03 oacfl2=0 size=0 offset=120 bfp=40759cbc bln=11 avl=07 flg=01 value= Dump of memory from 0x40759CBC to 0x40759CC3 40759CB0 0C0A6B78 [xk..] 40759CC0 00010101 [....] ________________________________ From: Sweetser, Joe Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 11:17 AM To: 'Allen, Brandon' Subject: RE: In a BIND again... Thanks yet again, Brandon. The datatype is 180 (timestamp) and when I describe the table the column is defined as number(1). More fun to come, I'm sure! -joe ________________________________ From: Allen, Brandon [mailto:Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 10:35 AM To: Sweetser, Joe; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: In a BIND again... Take a look at the BIND section of the raw trace file and see what they look like there. Maybe some of them were NULL so trace analyzer doesn't show them. I'm not sure since I haven't played with the trace analyzer much. I usually get by with just the raw trace file, tkprof and manually looking up the relevant table/index stats. Regards, Brandon Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.