Re: How much does it cost to run Enterprise Oracle on Linux?
- From: laura pena <lizzpenaorclgrp@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 06:41:28 -0800 (PST)
Yes you are correct.
I am looking at why we really need partitioning. The tables(like 4) were
designed this way, but I don't believe with current volumn we actaully have are
benefiting from this option.
Our largest table holds 11 millions rows. If we expect to grow that is great,
but Oracle reccomends to start partition a table when the table reaches 2g or
more in size.
Is that what everyone else has as a rule of thumb.
Thanks
Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Just an aside really
Laura, to me partitioning and parallelism (tend to) go hand in hand, it sounds
like an interesting system to me that only requires 2 cpus but also has
sufficient volumes of data to make splitting them worth while?
--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.orawin.info
---------------------------------
Cheap Talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
- References:
- Re: How much does it cost to run Enterprise Oracle on Linux?
- From: Niall Litchfield
Other related posts:
- » How much does it cost to run Enterprise Oracle on Linux?
- » Re: How much does it cost to run Enterprise Oracle on Linux?
- » Re: How much does it cost to run Enterprise Oracle on Linux?
- » Re: How much does it cost to run Enterprise Oracle on Linux?
- » Re: How much does it cost to run Enterprise Oracle on Linux?
- » Re: How much does it cost to run Enterprise Oracle on Linux?
- » RE: How much does it cost to run Enterprise Oracle on Linux?
- » RE: How much does it cost to run Enterprise Oracle on Linux?
- » RE: How much does it cost to run Enterprise Oracle on Linux?
- » Re: How much does it cost to run Enterprise Oracle on Linux?
- Re: How much does it cost to run Enterprise Oracle on Linux?
- From: Niall Litchfield