RE: Full vs Incremental
- From: <rajendra.pande@xxxxxxx>
- To: <Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <RStorey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:51:52 -0400
You can additionally run incremental merge if you want -
________________________________
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Allen, Brandon
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 2:48 PM
To: RStorey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; oracle-l-freelists
Subject: RE: Full vs Incremental
Here's what the docs say on it:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/backup.102/b14192/bkup004.h
tm#BRBSC133
In summary, incremental backups can be much smaller and faster than full
backups, especially in 10g+ with a block change tracking file. I've
been running incremental backups with RMAN and Netbackup for years and
haven't had any problems with them. As with any backup/recovery
strategy - you should test it (especially the restore & recovery)
thoroughly in your environment.
Regards,
Brandon
________________________________
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do
not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to
the official business of this company shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.
Please visit our website at
http://financialservicesinc.ubs.com/wealth/E-maildisclaimer.html
for important disclosures and information about our e-mail
policies. For your protection, please do not transmit orders
or instructions by e-mail or include account numbers, Social
Security numbers, credit card numbers, passwords, or other
personal information.
Other related posts:
