FW: ORA-01555: snapshot too old: rollback segment number 24 with name "_SYSSMU24$" too small
- From: Wittenmyer Joel - CO <WITTENMYERJ@xxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:41:42 -0500
Well, it's a client of mine, and they are challenging, but that's what makes
it fun! :O
Oh, but GATHER_STATS_JOB does do 'massive DML' (ok, maybe not massive, but a
lot :) ), in this case to the 'OPSTSTAT' objects in SYSAUX. Large numbers
of deletes in particular. The OPSTSTAT indexes can easily grow to 2 or 3
times the size of the tables. I rebuild them monthly to reclaim several Gig
of space. I've sat and watched the stats job run and had it blow out
max_extents on an undo segment. Over and Over.
I believe the bug is 4288876.
As I said, it sounds similar. It may not be the same issue, but may be
worth looking at.
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Gorbachev [mailto:gorbyx@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 3:12 PM
To: Wittenmyer Joel - CO
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: ORA-01555: snapshot too old: rollback segment number 24 with
name "_SYSSMU24$" too small
My respect if you can have terrabyte OLTP system running stable with
auto gather stats job. Quite challenging. :)
If you have bug # - please share.
Stats gathering doesn't do "massive DML". What it does is a lot of
selects and assuming those are long running, one can expect it to fail
with ORA-1555 on a busy OLTP system. The only DMLs are done to
dictionary tables to update stats (unless I seriously missing
something). Invalidation of execution plans caused by updating
statistics should have far more noticeable impact I believe.
2006/6/27, Wittenmyer Joel - CO <WITTENMYERJ@xxxxxxxx>:
> This sounds similar to a known bug with ASSM tablespaces. The stats job
> updates tables in SYSAUX. Those tables have indexes and up to 10.2.0.2 if
> an instance does massive DML (which the stats job does in our case.
> Terabyte oltp with daily data loads and many schemas) on segments in an
ASSM
> tablespace that has indexes, the undo is unbelievable. In our case it
> produces 10x the undo / redo it normally would. It can cause not only
> ora-1555, but you can blow out the max extents (32767) for an undo
segment.
> The 'workaround' of coalescing the indexes prior to running such DML is
only
> minimally effective. The backport patch for previous versions in some
cases
> flat doesn't work (I know from experience.) The only sure fix is to
upgrade
> to 10.2.0.2, which I am told definitely fixes the issue, and which I am
> preparing to do on several production instances even thought I HATE
applying
> the latest patchset (hornet's nest). Of course, if you are already on
> 10.2.0.2 and are seeing this, please let me know!
--
Best regards,
Alex Gorbachev
http://blog.oracloid.com
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
- » FW: ORA-01555: snapshot too old: rollback segment number 24 with name "_SYSSMU24$" too small
