Dear Chris Grabowy,
Thank you for speaking in
Denver at COLLABORATE 08 – IOUG Forum and for generously sharing your
time and expertise!
It is through the quality
content provided by our speakers that COLLABORATE attendees increase
their knowledge, their skills and their network. Needless to say, you
greatly contributed to the success of our conference and presentations,
such as yours, are what make COLLABORATE the premier learning
experience that it is!
Currently, we are in the
process of putting all conference proceedings into our LoOk (Library of
Oracle Knowledge) member area. If you made any changes to your paper
or presentation after you uploaded it, please send the updated version
to speakers@xxxxxxxx. We want to ensure that we have
the final version.
Please find the results
of your session evaluations below. The overall mean at COLLABORATE 08
– IOUG Forum was 3.48. That puts the majority of sessions into the
Very Good to Excellent rankings.
Thanks again for your
continued support of the IOUG; please look for the Call for Speakers
notification in late August. We look forward to seeing you in Orlando,
Florida for COLLABORATE 09 from May 3-7, 2009!
Peter Smith
IOUG Director of Education
Jon Wolfe
IOUG Technical Session
Chair
_______________________________________________________
IOUG Evaluation Report:
Session: #611: Wiki this
Way!!
Question 1: How well did
the abstract for this presentation describe its contents? (4=Very
Accurate, 1=Not Accurate)
Your score: 3.73
Question 2: Was the level
of technical content appropriate to the objective of the presentation?
(4=Very Appropriate, 1=Not Appropriate)
Your score: 3.5
Question 3: How effective
were the presenter's audio visual materials? (4=Very effective, 1=Not
effective)
Your score: 3.26
Question 4: Would you
recommend this session to others? (% Yes is shown)
Your score: 97
Question 5: How would you
rate the presenter's knowledge of the material presented? (4=Excellent,
1=Poor)
Your score: 3.55
Question 6: How would you
rate this presenter's speaking style? (4=Excellent, 1=Poor)
Your score: 3.23
Question 7: Overall, how
would you rate the quality of this presentation? (4=Excellent, 1=Poor)
Your score: 3.42
Overall Mean - Average of
means for questions 1-3 through 5-7.
Your score: 3.45
Written Commentary:
• A walk-through of how
Chris built the Wiki for his team. Screen shots would have been good.
• Lessons learned were
very helpful! Thank you!
• Opening could be
shortened, defining a wiki needed less time. Spend a little more time
on why you selected a particular Wiki. Do a bit more research… OSX
Server has a Wiki built-in for example. Info on hosted Wikis was very
helpful. ie: exit strategy
• Slow