Re: Critical Patch Update January 2005 for 10.1.0.2 Windows 32-bit Re-uploaded
- From: Paul Drake <bdbafh@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: qnxodba@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 19:18:23 -0500
Mike,
thanks, that cheered me up.
We didn't start rolling out 10.1 until after the 10.1.0.3 patchset
(rollup) came out, and since we weren't using ASM/RAC/CFS, we didn't
*need* to apply any additional patchsets
.
.
.
... yet.
That whole strategy of waiting for Release 2 to test ASM seems to be
paying off nicely
(you can de-cipher your own translation from that).
I did like the missing file message during install of the re-released
10.1.0.3 base release for lin32. Did you get such a message for lin32
10g yet?
Paul
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:59:38 -0500, mhthomas <qnxodba@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Oracle sends good news to procratinators. ;-)
>
> Mike
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Oracle Global Product Support <st-gspuser_us@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:26:45 -0800
> Subject: Critical Patch Update January 2005 for 10.1.0.2 Windows
> 32-bit Re-uploaded
> To: Oracle Global Product Support <st-gspuser_us@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Dear Oracle Customer,
>
> You are receiving this email because our records indicated you have
> downloaded the Critical Patch Update January 2005 for Oracle Database
> 10.1.0.2 for Windows 32-bit (Patch 4104364) on or before February 09,
> 2005.
>
#/etc/init.d/init.cssd stop
# f=ma, divide by 1, convert to moles.
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
- » Re: Critical Patch Update January 2005 for 10.1.0.2 Windows 32-bit Re-uploaded
