RE: Archived redo log size difference in 10gR2
- From: "Jesse, Rich" <Rich.Jesse@xxxxxx>
- To: "Quamrul Polash" <quapol@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "oracle-l" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:10:33 -0600
Bingo! Thanks for the pointer!
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: Quamrul Polash [mailto:quapol@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 2:01 PM
To: Jesse, Rich; oracle-l
Subject: RE: Archived redo log size difference in 10gR2
Please check Bug 5450861 reported in Metalink,
HTH,
Quamrul Polash
----------------------------------------
> Subject: Archived redo log size difference in 10gR2
> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:49:01 -0600
> From: Rich.Jesse@xxxxxx
> To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hey all,
>
> We're well on our way to implementing a new ERP system in 10.2.0.2.0
on
> AIX 5.3. One thing I've noticed is that while the redo logs are
~50MB,
> the archived redo logs from "regular" log switches are consistently
only
> ~45MB. On 9.2.0.5 on HPUX, our 90MB redos tend to switch with 2K
free.
>
> Not that this affects a whole lot in my planning, but I'm just
curious.
> Trapsing through the admin docs doesn't seem to mention anything other
> than the minimum size of a log is 4MB.
>
> Thoughts anyone? And if you have definitive info, where from?
>
> TIA,
> Rich
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Stay in touch with old friends and meet new ones with Windows Live
Spaces
http://spaces.live.com/signup.aspx
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Deploy new code
- From: Arnon, Yuval
- References:
- RE: Archived redo log size difference in 10gR2
- From: Quamrul Polash
Other related posts:
- » Archived redo log size difference in 10gR2
- » RE: Archived redo log size difference in 10gR2
- » RE: Archived redo log size difference in 10gR2
- » RE: Archived redo log size difference in 10gR2
- » RE: Archived redo log size difference in 10gR2
- » RE: Archived redo log size difference in 10gR2
- Deploy new code
- From: Arnon, Yuval
- RE: Archived redo log size difference in 10gR2
- From: Quamrul Polash