hi,Robert Blok thread 2 : 27 2 21-04-2004 15:37:31 21-04-2004 15:37:37= YES NO 28 2 21-04-2004 15:37:37 21-04-2004 15:37:43= YES NO ONLY 6 seconds , the logfile has no redo 29 2 21-04-2004 15:37:43 21-04-2004 15:40:48 YES= YES there are 3 minutes , how do you know the logfile has no = redo ? maybe some backgroud process generate redo ? how big are the archived logs ? they have the same bytes ? Best regards yahoo id: feng_chunpei A new dba from china ---- from the mail----- >Hi Guys, > >In a test I've been looking at some log files being applied to= the >standby database. We have a two node cluster shipping logs to a= single >node (physical) standby database. > >Below I've placed some log sequences from v$archived_log. >All changes are empty, that is, no real data was entered. Just= alter >system switch logfile. As you can see, sequence 27 was applied= just for >thread 1, not for thread 2. Sequence 29 has been applied for= both threads. >Both nodes are at sequence 30. If I look in the standby= database, I can >see both logs have been applied. > >Has anyone any idea about the discrepancy between the primary= node's >idea of "applied" and the standby node's "applied"? >Why is one sequence applied and the other not? > >Thanks a lot for some insight, >Robert. > > >Name >------------------ >SEQUENCE# >THREAD# >FIRST_TIME >NEXT_TIME >ARCHIVED >APPLIED >STATUS >COMPLETION_TIME > > SEQUENCE# THREAD# FIRST_TIME LAST_TIME = ARC APP S >TO_CHAR(COMPLETION_T >---------- ---------- ------------------- -------------------= --- --- - >-------------------- > 27 1 21-04-2004 15:36:51 21-04-2004 15:36:58= YES NO A >21-04-2004 15:36:58 > 27 1 21-04-2004 15:36:51 21-04-2004 15:36:58= YES YES A >21-04-2004 15:36:58 > 27 2 21-04-2004 15:37:31 21-04-2004 15:37:37= YES NO A >21-04-2004 15:37:38 > 27 2 21-04-2004 15:37:31 21-04-2004 15:37:37= YES NO A >21-04-2004 15:37:38 > > 28 1 21-04-2004 15:36:58 21-04-2004 15:37:13= YES NO A >21-04-2004 15:37:14 > 28 1 21-04-2004 15:36:58 21-04-2004 15:37:13= YES YES A >21-04-2004 15:37:14 > 28 2 21-04-2004 15:37:37 21-04-2004 15:37:43= YES NO A >21-04-2004 15:37:44 > 28 2 21-04-2004 15:37:37 21-04-2004 15:37:43= YES NO A >21-04-2004 15:37:44 > > 29 1 21-04-2004 15:37:13 21-04-2004 15:37:32= YES NO A >21-04-2004 15:37:32 > 29 1 21-04-2004 15:37:13 21-04-2004 15:37:32= YES YES A >21-04-2004 15:37:32 > 29 2 21-04-2004 15:37:43 21-04-2004 15:40:48= YES NO A >21-04-2004 15:40:49 > 29 2 21-04-2004 15:37:43 21-04-2004 15:40:48= YES YES A >21-04-2004 15:40:49 > > 30 1 21-04-2004 15:37:32 21-04-2004 15:40:48= YES NO A >21-04-2004 15:40:49 > 30 1 21-04-2004 15:37:32 21-04-2004 15:40:48= YES YES A >21-04-2004 15:40:49 > 30 2 21-04-2004 15:40:48 21-04-2004 15:41:18= YES NO A >21-04-2004 15:41:19 > 30 2 21-04-2004 15:40:48 21-04-2004 15:41:18= YES NO A >21-04-2004 15:41:19 > > > >----------------------------------------------------------------= >Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com >----------------------------------------------------------------= >To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. >-- >Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ >FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html >----------------------------------------------------------------= - > >. =A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------