Re: Any problem with Oracle Security Alert #68 - Security Patch
- From: Paul Drake <bdbafh@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ashoke.k.mandal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 00:47:00 -0500
Ashoke,
yes. I have experienced issues with applying Security Alert #68
patchsets on 8.1.7.4.x on win32.
There is a bug in patchsets later than 8.1.7.4.15 that affects the
java virtual machine.
There is a workaround available that we have successfully put in place
so that we could use the package utl_smtp (utl_tcp) with 8.1.7.4.16.
upgrade/migrate your 8.1.7 databases to 9.2.
Do not get stuck in the mire of a soon to be desupported release.
There are less than 60 days until no more fixes to be released for 8.1.7x.
Paul
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:12:34 -0500, Mandal, Ashoke
<ashoke.k.mandal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Did any of you have already applied this patch to 8.1.7.4 and 9.2.0.4 =
> databases? If yes then did you notice any problem.
>
> Thanks,
> Ashoke
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of sol beach
> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 2:36 PM
> To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Oracle Security Alert #68 - Security Vulnerabilities in
> Oracle'sS erver Products
>
> August 31, 2004
> Severity: 1=20
>
> Alert #68: Oracle Security Update
>
> =20
>
> Description
>
> This security alert addresses security vulnerabilities in Oracle's
> server products.
>
> Supported Products Affected
>
> * Oracle Database 10g Release 1, version 10.1.0.2
> * Oracle9i Database Server Release 2, versions 9.2.0.4 and 9.2.0.5
> * Oracle9i Database Server Release 1, versions 9.0.1.4 and 9.0.1.5
> * Oracle8i Database Server Release 3, version 8.1.7.4
> * Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control 10g, version 10.1.0.2
> * Oracle Enterprise Manager Database Control 10g, version 10.1.0.2
> * Oracle Application Server 10g (9.0.4), versions 9.0.4.0 and =
> 9.0.4.1
> * Oracle9i Application Server Release 2, versions 9.0.2.3 and =
> 9.0.3.1
> * Oracle9i Application Server Release 1, version 1.0.2.2=20
>
> On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:35:34 -0400 , surendra.tirumala@xxxxxx
> <surendra.tirumala@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >=20
> > They didn't mention anything about 9203 on Sun and 8.1.7(yes we have) =
> on
> > Sun.
> > Can I safely conclude that my systems are not effected?
> >=20
> > Thank you All!!
> > Surendra
> > ---
> > To unsubscribe - =
> mailto:oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx&subject=3Dunsubscribe
> > To read recent messages - =
> //freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/09-2004
> >
> ---
> To unsubscribe - =
> mailto:oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx&subject=3Dunsubscribe=20
> To read recent messages - //freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/09-2004
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
